Rum Runner Labs

Rhum J.M Gold

Rhum J.M Gold

Rhum J.M Gold

7.5/10

7.3/10

Neat Rating

8.2/10

Mixer Rating

Good

Value at $39.99

At 50% ABV, Rhum J.M Gold is not only the youngest aged agricole in Rhum J.M’s core lineup, but also their highest proof. Technically an “élevé sous bois” (literally “raised in wood”) meaning it’s at least one year old, J.M says the Gold spends time in both new oak and ex-Bourbon barrels. Everything about this rum suggests this is the aged option from their core line they expect people to mix with, including the price tag, which, at $39.99, while not super cheap, is the least expensive bottle we tried from Rhum J.M (Martinique Agricoles can be a pricey game).

We measured a density of 0.927g/cc and a refractive index of 1.3576, indicating no additives, in line with the requirements for the Martinique Rhum Agricole AOC.

On the nose it’s very clean, with little to none of the more funky vegetal notes you find in some agricoles. Instead there’s some dried fig, bourbon, apple, oak, and marmalade. On the palate the apple takes center stage, the bourbon sticks around and toasted vanilla notes enter the chat. The finish is medium strong, with vanilla and sweet cinnamon notes carrying through.

In our blind taste test we thought it was pretty good neat (7.3/10), and great mixed into a daiquiri (8.2/10). While not the undisputed champ, Rhum J.M Gold performs pretty well considering its age and price point—it outscores several offerings positioned as “nicer” rhums. The prominence of the bourbon cask is almost enough to count as an editorial choice, and the proof makes it a great option to lend some strength to a ti’ punch. This one has become a staple in my home bar for most drinks that call for an aged Martinique agricole, and given its position in the Rhum J.M product line, that’s probably the highest praise I could give it.

 

The Superficial: Over the course of this project I purchased multiple bottles of Rhum J.M Gold, and saw two distinct packaging treatments. The first (I believe older) had a plastic stopper with a natural cork and no embossing on the glass, whereas the second had a metal screw cap and the classic Rhum J.M crest embossed on it you’d find on the V.O. or V.S.O.P expressions. The label also matches the general vibe of the core line. While it’s clear that in both iterations of the bottle the Gold opts for less expensive choices, it’s nicer than a lot of workhorse mixers.

Minimum Age

1 years

ABV

50%

Volume

750mL

Refractometer

1.3576

Price Acquired

$39.99
Neat Rating: 7.3
Mixer Rating:8.2
Presentation Rating:7.0
Personal Rating:7.5

Overall Rating:

7.5/10
Rating Notes:
Tags:  
Appleton Estate Hearts Collection 1993

Appleton Estate Hearts Collection 1993

Appleton Estate Hearts Collection 1993

9.2/10

9.2/10

Neat Rating

9.2/10

Mixer Rating

Poor

Value at $299.99

Let’s talk about 1993: the world trade center was bombed, Nelson Mandela won a Nobel Peace Prize, and Appleton Estate laid down a couple of rum casks that, 29 years later, would join the Appleton Hearts Collection. At 29 years that entry is the second oldest to date in the Hearts lineup, after only the 37 year old 1984 which, while lauded, I think is generally accepted was a bit over-oaked. Given that the best Hearts installments marry intense Jamaican fruitiness with deep, rich, oaky age, the stakes of this review are clear: were the final couple years spent in a cask an asset or a liability for 1993?

We measured a density of 0.904g/cc and a refractive index of 1.3638, indicating no additives (duh) though as always I’m a bit befuddled by the fact they don’t tout “no additives” anywhere on the label—I suppose at this price point ($299, oof) and from this line, you’re just supposed to know.

On the nose it comes at you fast; 29 years may have mellowed some aspects of its character, but its still a 100% pot still rum, and touts a strong ester-forward nose of acetone, overripe pineapple, a touch of peach, and a ton of dusty oak. Compared to some of it’s younger siblings, it’s actually a little less obviously warm on the nose, and has much less banana to it. On the palate there’s a ton of evolution: the initial ethanol/acetone hit gives way to a plethora of fruity charred pineapple, fig, banana (not much but its there), and lychee-adjacent mangosteen, which in turn passes the baton to a heavy spice medley of ginger and vanilla. The finish is strong and adds some allspice and anise to the mix, with a touch of satisfying oaky bitterness.

In our blind taste test we thought it was incredible both as a neat sipper (9.0/10) and mixed into a daiquiri (9.2/10).

I obviously think this rum is insanely good, but it’s worth calling out this rum is clearly not for everyone: if Smith and Cross is “too funky” for you, then dropping $299 on this makes no sense at all. Additionally if you like oak too much you might be better off splurging on one of the older Foursquare ECS releases, and at the same time if you don’t care for oak much at all (you lucky duck) then you have much better, more affordable options to get your Jamaican ester-fix. But the fact that this is not a top pick for oak-loving carpenters is an implicit acknowledgement that it passes the test set up for it: it is not over oaked. It is oaky, and tannic, and deep, but all of that is in balance with it’s brighter, fruitier notes, and in between those two currents is space for a ton of complexity. “What happens to Jamaican Pot Still rum after 29 years in a cask?” is a question few rums can answer as eloquently or deliciously as Appleton Hearts 1993.

The Superficial: Standard Velier fare. Everything is thoughtful and quality, the design is restrained but tasteful.

Minimum Age

29 years

ABV

63%

Volume

750mL

Refractometer

1.3638

Price Acquired

$299.99
Neat Rating: 9.2
Mixer Rating:9.2
Presentation Rating:9.0
Personal Rating:9.5

Overall Rating:

9.2/10
Rating Notes:
Tags:  
Rhum J.M. Jardin Fruité

Rhum J.M. Jardin Fruité

Rhum J.M. Jardin Fruité

7.2/10

6.9/10

Neat Rating

7.9/10

Mixer Rating

Okay

Value at $41.96

Rhum J.M Jardin Fruité is an aged rhum agricole in J.M’s L’Atelier des Rhums line. In the distillery’s own words, the L’Atelier line explores “the possibilities of blending different sugarcane distillates, charring techniques, types of wood, and barrel capacities”. This includes the smokey Fumée Volcanique (no relation to Terroir Volcanique, why do you ask?), the spicy Épices Créoles, and of course the fruity and herby Jardin Fruité.

We measured a density of 0.943g/cc and a refractive index of 1.3558, indicating no additives, in line with the requirements for the Martinique Rhum Agricole AOC.

On the nose you can easily see Rhum J.M achieved what they were going for: lemon and apple are dominant, with additional notes of honey, vanilla, and a faint rosemary-/thyme herbaceousness. On the palate you get the first obvious expression of oak, more apple, and then a host of astringent notes like paper, tea, and bitter grassiness. The finish is moderate light (at 42% ABV this is the lowest proof of the trio) and gives more woody herbs.

In our blind taste test we thought it was okay as a neat sipper (6.9/10), and pretty good mixed into a daiquiri (7.9/10). Overall this made it the least successful of the three L’Ateliers, and in a way that makes sense. J.M has said this line places specific emphasis on barrel manipulation techniques, and while smoke and spice classically associated with barrel character, fruit and herb are generally thought of as coming from the base distillate, particularly in cane juice based agricoles. Really, the Jardin Fruité is the most “agricole” of the three, and if you’re looking for a big red “cane juice” button to press in a cocktail, it gets the job done, but many rums from J.M’s core lineup do as well.

The Superficial: The label designs for all the L’atelier des Rhums bottles are very cool; simultaneously modern and classic. The glass is a bit of a let down, and the plastic screw cap is probably less appealing than a metal one (much less a cork). Rhum J.M knows how to make delightful bottles, but perhaps with the emphasis on mixology, these expressions didn’t get a premium treatment.

Minimum Age

2 years

ABV

42%

Volume

700mL

Refractometer

1.3558

Price Acquired

$41.96
Neat Rating: 6.9
Mixer Rating:7.9
Presentation Rating:6
Personal Rating:7

Overall Rating:

7.2/10
Rating Notes:
Tags:  
Trois Rivieres Cuvee Du Moulin

Trois Rivieres Cuvee Du Moulin

Trois Rivieres Cuvee Du Moulin

7.1/10

7.0/10

Neat Rating

7.9/10

Mixer Rating

Okay

Value at $42.99

Trois Riviéres Cuvée du Moulin is a 3 year old column still cane juice rum from the La Mauny distillery on Martinique bottled at 40% ABV. In my home market in Seattle it’s one of the few french agricoles I regularly see on local shelves that’s not Clement or Rhum J.M, and with an aggregate score of 6.4/10 on RumX, I came into this review wondering if that shelf space could’ve been put to better use.

We measured a density of 0.946g/cc and a refractive index of 1.3538, indicating no additives, in line with the requirements for the Martinique Rhum Agricole AOC.

While is an agricole, and has all of the grassy, appley, vegetal notes you would expect, it’s fairly mild on the nose. Green apple, oak, a little flower shop, and some raisin are evident up front. On a second nosing you might get some mango and a little copper. The palate leans into the oak, with spicey pepperiness playing counterpoint to apple and prune. There’s some vegetal grassiness, as well as a hint of mint. The finish is pretty moderate, leaving relatively little oak and indexing mostly on the apple, raisin and mint from the palate.

In our blind taste test we thought it was pretty good both as a neat sipper (7.0/10) and mixed into a daiquiri (7.9/10). While not a show stopper, the Cuvée de Moulin provides a pretty approachable entryway into cane juice rum; there’s enough oak and spice to appeal to lovers of other aged spirits, and enough fresh apple to give you a sense of what to expect from French Agricoles. Maybe the shelves in my local liquor store could do better, but they could sure do a lot worse.

 

The Superficial: A quality feeling bottle with nice glass details. The matte embossed labels isn’t winning design awards, but looks reasonably nice and feels good. The metal wrap around the top feels substantial and is fun to pull off, and while the natural cork is nice, I wish there was a wooden stopper.

Minimum Age

3 years

ABV

40%

Volume

750mL

Refractometer

1.3538

Price Acquired

$42.99
Neat Rating: 7.0
Mixer Rating:7.9
Presentation Rating:7.0
Personal Rating:7

Overall Rating:

7.1/10
Rating Notes:
Tags:  
Appleton Estate Hearts Collection 2002

Appleton Estate Hearts Collection 2002

Appleton Estate Hearts Collection 2002

8.9/10

8.9/10

Neat Rating

9.1/10

Mixer Rating

Okay

Value at $218.99

Clocking in at the standard 63% ABV for its line, the 20 year old 2002 Appleton Estate Hearts Collection installment continues the distillery’s foray into high proof, high ester, insanely flavorful rum. In spite of the fact this is playing a bit against type for them, they’ve shown time and time again they know what they’re doing with the Hearts line. In the interest of not burying the lead, the 2002 is no exception.

We measured a density of 0.902g/cc and a refractive index of 1.3628, indicating no additives (duh) though as always I’m a bit befuddled by the fact they don’t tout “no additives” anywhere on the label.

On the nose it’s not quite as loud as some Hearts members, but has tons of complexity an nuance; oak and banana are probably the first notable notes, followed by some strawberry and something chocolate adjacent, along with mild citrus and flowers. Overall there’s something about the nose that just seems to ✨ sparkle ✨. On the palate you get a lot of oaky-banana continuity from the nose, with some distinct black tea and brown sugar notes and some warm spices. The Finish is strong mainly bringing leather, chocolate, and oak with some general astringency in line with the black tea from the palate.

In light of the ~$300 MSRP of the co-released 1993 Hearts and the eye watering $650 MSRP of the recent 1998, picking up the 2002 for a cool $218.99 seems like a steal of a deal. But the obvious point of comparison for 2002 is the 2003: with comparable vintages, comparable ages (20 and 18 respectively), comparable bottle counts (5,700 bottles of the 2002, 5,000 bottles of the 2003) and comparable prices (I picked up the 2003 for $215.00), the two rums are simultaneously very similar and cut distinct profiles. The 2002 technically has a higher congener content (834 g/100LAA vs 688 g/100LAA) but while the 2003 leans heavily into an acetone note that screams “high ester”, the 2002 is doing something a bit subtler with its congener profile—it’s equally fruity and funky, but in a bit of a gentler, more laid back way. If 2003 and 2002 are both trying to get into an exclusive nightclub, 2003 is making sure the bouncer knows who it is, whereas 2002 is quietly confident that, given a minute or two of sniffing, it’s admittance is inevitable.

It’s not a mild rum by any standard, and the fruity, oaky flavor will hit you like a freight train if you let it, but within the context of the Appleton Hearts Collection, the quality that really makes the 2002 stand out is its self-possession.

The Superficial: Standard Habitation Velier fare. Everything is thoughtful and quality, from the large block of informative text, to the cute illustration of the still, to the classic flask-like bottle shape and functional stopper.

Minimum Age

20 years

ABV

63%

Volume

750mL

Refractometer

1.3628

Price Acquired

$218.99
Neat Rating: 8.9
Mixer Rating:9.1
Presentation Rating:9.0
Personal Rating:9.0

Overall Rating:

8.9/10
Rating Notes:
Tags: